What are L2 EVM networks: a complete guide
L2 EVM networks are scaling layers built atop Ethereum to boost throughput, cut gas fees, and keep Ethereum’s security. They process most transactions off-chain using Optimistic or ZK rollups, then settle proofs on Ethereum. These networks enable cheaper, faster DeFi, gaming, and NFT operations while staying fully EVM-compatible. Each has its native token for gas, governance, and staking, and many reward early users with airdrops and incentive campaigns. Growth is driven by ecosystem expansion, shared frameworks like the OP Stack, and active user communities. Key 2025 leaders include Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, zkSync, Scroll, Linea, Base, and Blast.
Table of Contents:
- 🌐 What EVM L2 networks are — and why they appeared
- 🧩 Rollup families — the dominant EVM L2 architecture
- ⚙️ Advantages and Real-World Nuances
- 🚀 Growth Dynamics and Token Economics of L2 Networks
- 💰 How Users Can Earn on L2 Networks
- 🔎 Where to Find New Earning Opportunities on L2
- ⚡ Popular EVM L2 Solutions (Quick Reference)
🧱 What EVM L2 networks are — and why they appeared
Layer 2 (L2) networks are blockchain frameworks built on top of Ethereum (Layer 1) to improve its scalability without compromising decentralization or security. They process transactions separately—often in batches—and periodically post compressed proofs or summaries back to Ethereum for verification. These networks emerged because Ethereum’s base layer has limited throughput (around 15 transactions per second) and high gas fees, which make small transactions costly and slow during network congestion. L2 solutions offload most computations from the main chain, enabling faster, cheaper, and more efficient transactions while Ethereum remains the final arbiter of security and settlement.
The “EVM” (Ethereum Virtual Machine) compatibility means these networks behave almost identically to Ethereum:
- They can run Solidity smart contracts and support familiar tools such as MetaMask, Hardhat, and Remix.
- Developers can deploy existing dApps with minimal code changes, allowing ecosystems like DeFi, NFT marketplaces, and games to scale seamlessly.
Ethereum’s original design prioritizes security and decentralization, but this leads to limited throughput and high gas costs during peak activity. L2 networks emerged as the practical solution to the so-called blockchain trilemma — the challenge of achieving scalability, security, and decentralization simultaneously.
By moving execution to L2 while keeping data availability and consensus on L1, these systems inherit Ethereum’s trust model but dramatically expand capacity.
🧩 Rollup families — the dominant EVM L2 architecture
At the heart of most EVM-based L2s lies the rollup model, a mechanism that “rolls up” thousands of L2 transactions into a single compressed proof on Ethereum. Rollups are currently the most mature and secure scaling approach and come in two primary types: Optimistic Rollups and Zero-Knowledge (ZK) Rollups.
🟧 Optimistic Rollups
Examples: Optimism, Arbitrum, Base
Optimistic Rollups assume every transaction is valid by default (“optimistically”), without verifying every operation on Ethereum immediately. Instead, they rely on a fraud-proof system:
- When a batch of transactions is submitted to Ethereum L1, there is a challenge period (typically 7 days) during which anyone can dispute an invalid transaction by submitting a fraud proof.
- If no challenge occurs, the batch is finalized and considered correct.
This design reduces the amount of computation done on L1, achieving massive cost reductions and high throughput. However, it introduces trade-offs:
- Withdrawals from L2 to L1 take time because users must wait out the challenge window.
- Some operations (like bridging or yield farming) rely on liquidity providers to offer “fast exits” in exchange for small fees.
- Security depends on at least one honest validator monitoring the chain to detect fraud.
Optimistic Rollups are simpler and cheaper to implement than ZK Rollups, which explains why Arbitrum and Optimism dominate L2 usage today, together processing more transactions than Ethereum mainnet itself.
🟦 Zero-Knowledge (ZK) Rollups
Examples: zkSync Era, Polygon zkEVM, Scroll, Linea
ZK Rollups use cryptographic proofs of validity—known as Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs)—to confirm that all off-chain transactions are correct before they are posted to Ethereum.
How it works:
- Transactions are executed off-chain on the L2 network.
- The L2 generates a validity proof (using zk-SNARK or zk-STARK cryptography).
- This small proof is published on Ethereum, where smart contracts verify it almost instantly.
Since the proof mathematically guarantees correctness, there is no need for a challenge window — meaning withdrawals are nearly instant, and finality is immediate once the proof is accepted by Ethereum. Key advantages:
- Instant settlement — no waiting for disputes or fraud checks.
- Enhanced security — proofs are mathematically guaranteed rather than reliant on honest watchers.
- Compact data footprint — only small proofs are sent to Ethereum, making scaling highly efficient.
Drawbacks:
- Complex proving systems — generating ZK proofs is computationally heavy and expensive.
- Hardware requirements — validators and provers need specialized setups.
- Developer adaptation — although zkEVM aims for full EVM equivalence, some implementations still differ slightly from standard Solidity behavior.
Despite these challenges, ZK Rollups are widely seen as the long-term future of Ethereum scaling, with ongoing breakthroughs like Type-2 zkEVMs rapidly improving compatibility and performance.
Summary
Feature | 🟧 Optimistic Rollups | 🟦 ZK Rollups |
---|---|---|
Examples | Arbitrum, Optimism, Base | zkSync Era, Polygon zkEVM, Scroll, Linea |
Verification method | Fraud proofs (only if challenged) | Validity proofs (always verified) |
Finality speed | ~7 days (challenge period) | Instant (once proof verified) |
Security model | Economic incentives + monitoring | Mathematical proof correctness |
Withdrawal time | Slow (requires challenge window) | Near-instant |
Gas efficiency | High (due to batching) | Even higher long-term (compact proofs) |
Complexity | Easier to implement | Cryptographically advanced, heavier proving |
Hardware requirements | Low to moderate | High — requires specialized proving setups |
Maturity (2025) | Battle-tested, dominant today | Rapidly evolving, long-term standard |
EVM compatibility | Full (native Solidity support) | Near full, improving with Type-2 zkEVMs |
Best suited for | General DeFi, trading, bridges | Payments, gaming, mass-scale apps |
⚙️ Advantages and Real-World Nuances
L2 networks offer clear and practical improvements over Ethereum’s main layer. Their biggest advantage lies in cost and speed: by executing transactions off-chain and submitting only compressed data to Ethereum, they achieve much lower gas fees and higher throughput, making them ideal for DeFi platforms, NFT marketplaces, and gaming applications. Users and developers also benefit from EVM compatibility, which means existing smart contracts, tools, and wallets can be reused with minimal changes — migration from L1 feels seamless.
Another crucial strength is security inheritance. Unlike independent sidechains, rollups post transaction data and proofs directly to Ethereum, leveraging its consensus and validator set. This ensures that even if an L2 operator fails, users can still recover their assets through Ethereum itself.
However, these advantages come with several trade-offs. Optimistic rollups rely on a challenge period — usually about seven days — before withdrawals are finalized, which can slow user exits to L1. Liquidity protocols and third-party bridges help bypass this wait, but they add another layer of risk.
In early stages, most L2s also depend on centralized sequencers to order transactions. While this allows fast confirmation and smoother UX, it temporarily limits decentralization until multi-sequencer or permissionless models mature — progress that can be tracked via transparency dashboards like L2BEAT.
Finally, ZK rollups, though faster and more secure in theory, remain technically complex. Generating zero-knowledge proofs demands powerful hardware and specialized infrastructure, even though verifying those proofs on Ethereum is relatively cheap and fast.
In short, L2 networks bring Ethereum scalability within reach, but each comes with its own balance between cost, convenience, and decentralization.
🚀 Growth Dynamics and Token Economics of L2 Networks
The rapid rise of Ethereum’s Layer 2 ecosystems is not accidental — it’s the result of carefully balanced economics, usability, and culture. While the technical foundation of rollups provides scalability, the true success of an L2 network depends on how it attracts users, developers, and liquidity.
⚡ Cost, Speed, and User Experience
The first and most visible growth lever for L2 networks is transaction efficiency. By offloading execution from Ethereum’s main chain, they deliver dramatically cheaper and faster transactions, which unlocks use cases that were previously impractical on L1 due to gas costs — such as micro-trading, gaming, or minting NFTs at scale.
For developers, L2s also simplify onboarding: because they’re fully EVM-compatible, existing smart contracts and tools can be deployed with minimal adaptation. Users benefit from a smoother experience — fast confirmations, lower fees, and interfaces nearly identical to Ethereum. In essence, L2s turn the Ethereum ecosystem into a more accessible and affordable environment for both builders and everyday users.
🌐 Ecosystem Effects and Network Momentum
Once users arrive, the network effect becomes self-reinforcing. The more protocols and liquidity pools exist on an L2, the more reasons there are for others to join. Flagship dApps — such as Uniswap, Aave, or GMX — serve as anchors that bootstrap liquidity and attract additional builders.
Projects like Arbitrum and Optimism actively support new teams through grants, hackathons, and integration programs, ensuring that their ecosystems grow not just in size but also in diversity. Over time, this cumulative activity forms a self-sustaining loop: liquidity → users → applications → more liquidity.
🎯 Incentives, Culture, and Airdrops
Economic and cultural incentives have proven powerful catalysts for growth. Airdrops, quests, and points systems encourage users to test new platforms, while developer grants fund early projects that demonstrate value. These mechanisms don’t just attract speculative users — they also stress-test infrastructure and reveal how the network performs under load.
Some L2s, like Base, deliberately took a different path, launching without a native token. Instead, Base leveraged the OP Stack (shared with Optimism) and focused on user experience, branding, and a strong cultural narrative. Others, such as zkSync and Blast, leaned heavily on incentive campaigns, distributing tokens to early adopters and liquidity providers to rapidly bootstrap activity. Behind these efforts lies a common strategy: building community ownership and engagement from the ground up, rather than relying solely on technical appeal.
🧩 Composability and Shared Frameworks
As the L2 landscape matures, modularity becomes key to long-term growth. Frameworks like the OP Stack or Arbitrum Orbit allow multiple chains to share the same core technology, forming unified ecosystems like Optimism’s Superchain.
This approach standardizes the tech stack — meaning different L2s can interoperate, share security assumptions, and exchange assets or messages with minimal friction. For developers, it’s a major leap toward multi-chain scalability: deploy once, operate across many connected networks. For users, it means consistent experience and lower risk, as all participating chains inherit common trust guarantees and infrastructure.
💠 Native Tokens and Their Real Roles
Every L2 network eventually defines its economic foundation through its native token — though the specifics vary. These tokens are not just speculative assets; they serve functional and governance purposes that help the ecosystem operate sustainably. Core functions include:
- Gas payments: Some networks use their own tokens for transaction fees (e.g., Polygon’s MATIC/POL), while others rely on ETH (e.g., Optimism, Base).
- Medium of exchange: Native tokens facilitate internal transfers and liquidity pairs within the ecosystem.
- Staking and security: In L2s with proof-of-stake or validator models, tokens can secure the network and incentivize honest participation.
- Governance: Token holders often influence protocol upgrades, treasury allocations, and future incentive programs (e.g., ARB for Arbitrum and OP for Optimism).
Each network balances these roles differently depending on its roadmap and decentralization goals. In the long run, token utility and governance maturity will determine which ecosystems evolve into the most sustainable pillars of Ethereum’s Layer 2 future.
💰 How Users Can Earn on L2 Networks
Participating in Ethereum’s L2 ecosystem isn’t a get-rich-quick strategy — it’s more like planting seeds in a growing field. By using, testing, and supporting new networks, users can earn airdrops, rewards, and yield opportunities that may become valuable over time. It’s not guaranteed income, but for those who believe in the long-term future of Ethereum scaling, these activities can bring solid returns on patience and consistency.
🌱 Early Participation and Airdrops
Most new L2s reward early users through token airdrops. Simply bridging assets, making transactions, or interacting with dApps can make you eligible for future rewards.
Examples of major airdrops:
- Arbitrum ($ARB): In March 2023, distributed 1.162 billion ARB (11.62% of supply) among users — from 625 to 10 250 tokens per wallet.
- Optimism ($OP): First airdrop in 2022 for ~248 000 addresses (~200 million OP); later rounds followed in 2023 and 2024.
- zkSync ($ZK): In June 2024, ~695 000 wallets received user and contributor allocations for early activity.
- Blast ($BLAST): 2024–2025 multi-phase campaigns rewarding users who bridged funds or used ecosystem apps.
🪙 Tip: Airdrop farming is time-consuming and risky. Always follow official sources and never connect wallets to unknown sites.
💧 Liquidity Pools and Yield Opportunities
Another way to earn on L2s is by providing liquidity to decentralized exchanges and DeFi protocols.
- Deposit token pairs (for example, ETH + USDC) into liquidity pools on L2 DEXs such as Uniswap, Velodrome, or SyncSwap.
- Receive LP tokens that represent your share of the pool and earn a portion of trading fees.
- Stake LP tokens in additional farming programs to earn extra incentives from network treasuries or partner dApps.
- Low gas fees on L2s make compounding small profits practical — unlike on Ethereum L1, where fees often eat rewards.
🧭 Quests, Points, and Ecosystem Incentives
Many L2 ecosystems use quests, point programs, and campaigns to engage users and reward on-chain participation.
- Join tasks on platforms like Galxe, Layer3, or Zealy — bridge assets, interact with smart contracts, or mint NFTs.
- Earn points or NFTs that may later convert into tokens during future airdrops.
- Stay active across multiple L2s to build an early-user footprint, increasing your eligibility for upcoming distributions.
🌾 Long-Term Mindset — Harvest, Don’t Chase
The best results come with patience and consistency.
- View participation as a long-term investment in Ethereum’s scaling future, not quick profit chasing.
- Diversify your activity — bridge, stake, provide liquidity, and test new dApps across several L2s.
- When these projects mature, your early support can translate into governance tokens, staking rewards, or ecosystem incentives.
- Small, steady actions today can grow into a meaningful digital harvest tomorrow.
🔎 Where to Find New Earning Opportunities on L2
Staying updated on new airdrops, quests, liquidity programs, and ecosystem campaigns is essential if you want to maximize your rewards across Ethereum Layer 2 networks. Reliable information sources help you distinguish real opportunities from noise and scams. Below is a concise guide on where to look and what to monitor.
🌍 L2 Trackers and Data Aggregators
- L2BEAT: The most trusted dashboard for L2 projects — shows live networks, TVL, risk levels, decentralization stages, and upcoming chains.
- DefiLlama Airdrops: Lists tokenless protocols likely to launch airdrops. Also tracks chains, DEXes, and bridges by liquidity and usage.
- RootData: A live feed for Testnet/Mainnet launches and confirmed airdrop events with research and investor data.
- Dune Analytics: Community dashboards that visualize on-chain metrics for Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, and zk-rollups.
🧭 Quest Platforms and Point Programs
- Galxe, Layer3, Zealy, and Intract host official quests from L2 networks and dApps — tasks like bridging, swaps, minting NFTs, or staking tokens earn points and on-chain badges.
- Follow campaign seasons closely — these points are often converted into airdrops or governance tokens later.
📣 Official Channels and Project Updates
- Docs & Blogs: Check the official
Announcements
orChangelog
sections on project websites for early notices of mainnet launches and incentive rounds. - Twitter (X): Create curated lists for major L2s — Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Polygon, zkSync, Scroll, Linea.
- Discord & Telegram: Monitor #announcements and #quests channels for deadlines, snapshot dates, and allowlist forms.
- GitHub: Watch repositories for new releases — often the first sign of upcoming testnets or bounty programs.
📰 Crypto Media and Research
- The Defiant, Bankless, CoinDesk, and The Block regularly publish news and guides on Layer 2 ecosystems and incentive programs.
- Messari and Delphi Digital offer in-depth reports on network growth, token economics, and adoption metrics.
- Official newsletters (e.g., Optimism Collective, Arbitrum Foundation, Polygon Labs) summarize grant rounds, quests, and ecosystem integrations every week.
⏱️ Practical Monitoring Setup
- Use TweetDeck (X Pro) to track keywords like “Airdrop,” “Testnet,” “RetroPGF,” and “Quest.”
- Keep a simple Notion or Google Sheet to log networks, dApps, actions, and snapshot dates.
- Add a recurring reminder for claim windows, campaign endings, and token unlock events.
- Review addresses via DeBank or Zerion to monitor balances, rewards, and interactions across multiple L2s.
⚠️ Security tip: Always verify project domains, use a dedicated wallet for testing, regularly revoke token approvals, and never share private keys or seed phrases — even during a “quest” or “airdrop claim.”
⚡ Popular EVM L2 Solutions (Quick Reference)
🧩 Network | 🔍 Description & Core Idea | 🌐 Official Link |
---|---|---|
Arbitrum One (Optimistic Rollup) | The most widely used Optimistic L2. Employs multi-round fraud proofs and hosts a large DeFi ecosystem. Withdrawals to Ethereum take ~7 days, though third-party bridges enable faster exits. | arbitrum.io • arbitrum.foundation |
Optimism (OP Mainnet) (Optimistic Rollup / OP Stack) | Core of the Superchain — a shared OP Stack for interconnected L2s. Features active incentive programs, governance via $OP, and strong developer tooling. | optimism.io • docs.optimism.io |
Base (OP Stack L2 using ETH for gas) | Coinbase-developed L2 built on OP Stack. No native token; focuses on mass adoption through culture, memes, and an easy builder experience. | base.org |
Polygon PoS (EVM Sidechain) | A fast, low-cost EVM-compatible chain with its own validator set. Security model differs from rollups. Transition from MATIC → POL token in progress. | polygon.technology |
Polygon zkEVM (ZK Rollup) | Full EVM-equivalent Zero-Knowledge Rollup using validity proofs. Offers faster finality and lower latency for L1 withdrawals. | polygon.technology/polygon-zkevm |
zkSync Era (ZK Rollup) | Uses zk-SNARK proofs for high-speed, secure execution. Fully EVM-compatible with minor differences. $ZK token launched via airdrop in 2024. | zksync.io |
Scroll (ZK Rollup) | Implements bytecode-level EVM compatibility. Focused on developer-friendly tools and optimized zk-proof generation. | scroll.io |
Linea (ZK Rollup by Consensys) | Type-2 zkEVM tightly integrated with MetaMask and Infura. Hosts periodic quests, points, and ecosystem campaigns. | linea.build |
Arbitrum Nova (AnyTrust L2) | Designed for gaming and social apps with ultra-low fees. Uses a Data Availability Committee (DAC) instead of full rollup DA. | arbitrum.io/nova |
Blast (EVM L2 with built-in yield & airdrops) | Combines L2 scalability with native yield generation and aggressive community incentives. Evolving tokenomics and campaign phases. | blast.io |